Partial Vs Total Knee Replacement: Choosing the Right Procedure

Partial Vs Total Knee Replacement: Choosing the Right Procedure

Request for a Expert Opinion

*With this information, I as a user, give MediGence the permission to access my healthcare related data and information to help me get the expert opinion.

Knee osteoarthritis is a prevalent condition affecting millions of individuals worldwide, leading to debilitating pain and compromised mobility. When conservative treatments fail to provide relief, surgical interventions such as knee replacement become necessary.

However, there are two primary options for knee replacement procedures:

  • Partial knee replacement (PKR)
  • Total knee replacement (TKR)

Each procedure has its benefits and considerations, making it crucial for patients to understand their options and make an informed decision in consultation with their healthcare provider.

Partial vs. Total Knee Replacement: A Detailed Comparison


  • PKR: Partial knee replacement is typically indicated for patients with localized osteoarthritis confined to one compartment of the knee, usually the medial or lateral compartment. It may also be suitable for individuals with post-traumatic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis affecting specific areas of the knee.
  • TKR: Total knee replacement is indicated for patients with more widespread knee arthritis affecting multiple joint compartments. It is also recommended for individuals with significant deformity, instability, or failure of conservative treatments.

>>Surgical Approach

  • PKR: Partial knee replacement involves a smaller incision and less bone removal than TKR. It is a minimally invasive procedure, resulting in reduced blood loss, post-operative pain, and faster recovery times.
  • TKR: Total knee replacement requires a larger incision and more extensive bone resection to accommodate the implant components. While it is more invasive, advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care have contributed to improved outcomes and shorter hospital stays.

>>Implant Design

  • PKR: Partial knee replacement implants are designed to resurface only the damaged portion of the knee joint while preserving healthy tissue. They come in various configurations, including fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing designs, allowing for customization based on patient anatomy and surgeon preference.
  • TKR: Total knee replacement implants consist of components for the femur, tibia, and patella, replacing the entire joint surface. These implants are available in different sizes and materials, such as metal alloys and high-density polyethylene, to optimize stability, motion, and durability.

>>Recovery and Rehabilitation

  • PKR: Partial knee replacement typically allows for a quicker recovery than TKR, with many patients returning to light activities within a few weeks after surgery. Physical therapy is crucial in restoring the knee’s strength, flexibility, and function.
  • TKR: Total knee replacement involves a more extended rehabilitation process due to the larger surgical incision and more extensive tissue trauma. While patients may begin walking with assistance soon after surgery, full recovery and return to activities may take several months.

>>Complications and Risks

  • PKR: Complications associated with partial knee replacement include infection, implant loosening, stiffness, and persistent pain. Proper patient selection, meticulous surgical technique, and adherence to post-operative protocols help minimize these risks.
  • TKR: Total knee replacement carries risks similar to PKR, including infection, implant failure, blood clots, and nerve damage. However, the overall complication rate tends to be slightly higher due to the more extensive nature of the procedure.

>>Long-Term Outcomes

  • PKR: Studies have shown favorable long-term outcomes following partial knee replacement, with many patients experiencing significant pain relief and functional improvement for up to 10-15 years post-surgery. Proper patient selection and implant alignment are critical factors influencing longevity.
  • TKR: Total knee replacement is associated with excellent long-term outcomes, with most patients enjoying pain-free function and improved quality of life for 20 years or more. Advances in implant technology and surgical techniques continue to enhance the durability and performance of TKR implants.

In conclusion

Partial knee replacement and total knee replacement are effective surgical options for managing knee osteoarthritis and restoring function in affected individuals. The choice between PKR and TKR depends on various factors, including the extent of arthritis, location of joint damage, patient age, activity level, and surgeon expertise.

While PKR offers the advantages of a less invasive procedure, faster recovery, and preservation of healthy tissue, TKR provides comprehensive relief for advanced arthritis affecting multiple knee compartments. Ultimately, patients should discuss their treatment options with an orthopedic surgeon to determine the most suitable approach based on their needs and goals.


Are you struggling to find what you are looking for?

Get Expert's Callback
Reviewed By :- Tanya Bose

Fauzia Zeb Fatima

Fauzia Zeb is a medical and scientific content writer with a strong background in pharmaceutical science, having earned B.Pharm and M.Pharm degrees from renowned institutions like MIT and Jamia Hamdard University. With her extensive knowledge of medical science, she excels in communicating innovative concepts clearly and effectively through blog posts and articles, ensuring accessibility to the target audience.

Recent Post

Our Success Stories

Our team of healthcare experts would be happy to assist you

Get In Touch
or call

(+1) 424 283 4838